Photomultiplier and detection systems

ABSTRACT

The invention provides a switchable photomultiplier switchable between a detecting state and a non-detecting state including a cathode upon which incident radiation is arranged to impinge. The photomultiplier also includes a series of dynodes arranged to amplify a current created at the cathode upon detection of photoradiation. The invention also provides a detection system arranged to detect radiation-emitting material in an object. The system includes a detector switchable between a detecting state in which the detector is arranged to detect radiation and a non-detecting state in which the detector is arranged to not detect radiation. The system further includes a controller arranged to control switching of the detector between the states such that the detector is switched to the non-detecting state while an external radiation source is irradiating the object.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 13/775,253, filed on Feb. 25, 2013, and now U.S. Pat. No.8,735,833, issued on May 27, 2014, which, in turn, is a continuation ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/997,251, filed on Mar. 7, 2011, andnow U.S. Pat. No. 8,389,942, issued on Mar. 5, 2013, which, in turn, isa national stage application of PCT/GB2009/001444, filed on Jun. 11,2009, which, in turn, relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number0810638.7, filed on Jun. 11, 2008, for priority. All priorityapplications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a photomultiplier, particularly (butnot exclusively) useful in detection systems for detectingradiation-emitting material in an object, e.g. uranium in a box or alorry.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There is a requirement for screening of cargo items for detection ofillicit materials and devices. Among these illicit substances arespecial nuclear materials such as Uranium and Plutonium.

It is known that such materials can be detected using radiationdetectors operating in a pulse counting mode where the detector isselected for the measurement of gamma radiation, typically in the energyrange 0.05 MeV to 2 MeV.

These devices are typically operated in a portal design 10 in whichlarge slabs of radiation detector material 12 are suspended either sideof a measuring area and an item 14 under inspection is driven betweenthe radiation detectors as shown in FIG. 1, in order to attempt todetect any radiation source 16.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The independent claims define aspects of the invention for whichprotection is sought. The dependent claims define preferable inventivefeatures. Any of the features of the dependent claims may be used incombination with the features of other claims, even if they are notexplicitly dependent upon them—this will be clear to a person skilled inthe field.

Where a feature is claimed in one category (e.g. method, system,detector, arrangement, etc.) protection is sought for that feature inother categories even if not explicitly claimed.

BRIEF OF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way ofexample only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 shows a typical portal design of radiation detector;

FIG. 2 shows a set of radiation detectors (X-ray and passive radiation)according to an embodiment of this invention;

FIG. 3 diagrammatically represents a series of X-ray pulses used withthe present invention;

FIG. 4 shows a conventional photomultiplier tube circuit;

FIG. 5 shows a photomultiplier tube circuit according according to anembodiment of this invention;

FIG. 6 shows a timing diagram of X-ray output against cathode potentialprovided by the circuit of FIG. 5;

FIG. 7 shows a circuit suitable for driving the cathode switchingpotential in the circuit of FIG. 5;

FIG. 8 shows a data acquisition system for use with an embodiment ofthis invention;

FIG. 9 shows a shaper circuit for shaping the data signal received froma photomultiplier tube according to an embodiment of this invention;

FIGS. 10 and 11 show alternative discriminators for use with embodimentsof this invention;

FIG. 12 shows an example of a user viewable output from the system of anembodiment of this invention;

FIG. 13 shows a data acquisition system of an embodiment of thisinvention; and

FIG. 14 shows an alternative photomultiplier tube circuit according toan embodiment of this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the present invention, it is recognised that the use of high energyX-ray inspection devices is becoming increasingly common for cargoscreening, and that the X-rays produced by these devices interfere withthe standard passive radiation detection systems so reducing thesensitivity of the passive radiation detection system to hidden specialnuclear materials and other gamma-ray emitting sources.

The independent claims define aspects of the invention for whichprotection is sought. The dependent claims define preferable inventivefeatures. Any of the features of the dependent claims may be used incombination with the features of other claims, even if they are notexplicitly dependent upon them—this will be clear to a person skilled inthis field.

In the first aspect of this invention, a set of radiation detectors 18for passive radiation monitoring are co-located with a set of imagingdetectors 20 for high-energy X-ray inspection. An example embodiment isshown in FIG. 2. The X-ray source 22 will typically be an X-ray linearaccelerator in which the output beam comprises a series of intensepulses of X-rays as described in FIG. 3. The period between pulses istypically 10 ms with a pulse width of typically 5 μs. Therefore, forapproximately 99.95% of the time, the X-ray beam is not emitting. Otherpulse arrangements will be apparent to the skilled person.

In the time between X-ray pulses, the passive radiation detectors 18 areable to accumulate the gamma-ray signal as planned. However, every 10 msor so, the operation of the gamma-ray detectors will be significantlyperturbed the presence of the X-ray beam, and this will destroy thevalidity of the gamma-ray signals that were collected in the previoustime period.

In order to address this issue, in the present invention a circuit isdescribed that effectively renders the gamma-ray detectors 18 inactiveduring the X-ray pulse period, but enables the detectors 18 at all othertimes.

Typically, a gamma ray detector that is designed for monitoring of lowactivity gamma ray sources will be as large as possible in order tosubtend the largest possible solid angle back to the source. Therefore,it is uncommon to use a semiconductor detector for this purpose.Further, the gamma radiation is often at high energy and so the use of alarge volume gas ionisation based detection system is generallyconsidered to be impractical. Generally, such detectors use ascintillation detector that may be a high density in-organic materialsuch as CsI, NaI or BGO or a low density in-organic plasticscintillator. In the case of a passive radiation monitor, it isconventional to employ a large plastic scintillator since this isgenerally a less expensive solution than using an in-organic detectormaterial.

In either case, the scintillator converts the gamma-ray energy to anoptical light pulse which is transported through the bulk of thescintillator material to one or more optical detectors. These detectorscould be made from a semiconductor material such as silicon. However,the area that would need to be covered by detector material makes suchan approach expensive, and the large area drives up capacitance which inturn makes forming a low noise readout circuit extremely difficult. Amore practical solution is to utilise one or more photomultiplier tubes.A photomultiplier tube comprises a vacuum envelope within which is aphotocathode, a number of dynodes and an anode. Light passes into thephotocathode from the scintillator and results in the generation of lowenergy photoelectrons. These photoelectrons are drifted in an electricfield towards a first dynode. As they pass through the field, thephotoelectrons pick up energy such that when they strike the firstdynode, each photoelectron is capable of generating multiple secondaryelectrons (typically 3 to 5). These secondary electrons accelerate in anelectric field towards a second dynode where further secondary electronsare generated. Finally a large cloud of electrons reach an anode where alarge current pulse is generated per incident optical photon. A typicalgain is 10⁶ electrons per photon.

A photomultiplier tube is typically wired up using a resistor chainsubstantially as shown in FIG. 4. Often, a photomultiplier tube willhave 10 dynodes and will be operated with a positive high voltage ofaround 1000V. Using Ohms law, it can be seen that the voltage betweendynodes is then around 83V. To improve system linearity and uniformityof signal collection from the photocathode of the photomultiplier tube,the accelerating voltage between the cathode and first dynode is oftenincreased to around 165V.

At high dynode numbers, it is often advantageous to place capacitors inparallel with the resistor chain in order to support the high currentpulses in this region of the dynode chain to ensure stable operatingvoltage which in turn ensures good linearity of the detection system.This is shown with dynode do in FIG. 4.

When subjected to a large signal pulse due to exposure to radiation froman X-ray linear accelerator, voltage drops start to occur across thedynode chain due to the exceptionally high current flows that resultfrom such a bright signal and this causes the voltage across thephotomultiplier tube to collapse. This sends a large current pulsethrough the coupling capacitor, C_(L), into the preamplifier which inturn saturates the subsequent readout electronics. It can take tens ofmilliseconds for the detection system to return back to a usableoperating state. In the context of a combined X-ray and gamma-raydetection system, this is an unacceptable operating condition.

In the present invention, an alternative circuit topology 50 isdescribed and is shown in FIG. 5. Here, the first dynode, d1, isconnected to ground and a standard resistor ladder is used from thispoint forwards. The cathode is now connected to a switching potentialwhich may be set to a negative value with respect to ground potential orto a small positive potential with respect to ground potential. Sincethere is a physically large separation between the cathode and firstdynode and the dielectric constant of vacuum is essentially zero, thecapacitive coupling between the cathode and dynode is negligible. Thismeans that the potential that is applied to the cathode can be variedwith very high slew rate with no significant measureable effect at thefirst dynode or consequently at any further point in the signal chain.This provides a very clean way to disable the electronics during thehigh intensity burst of X-ray signal from the X-ray linear acceleratorsource.

Referring to FIGS. 5 and 6, it is seen that if the cathode potentialnormally rests at a negative potential (typically −165V) with respect toground then the photomultiplier tube operates normally and behaves as apassive radiation monitor. During an X-ray output phase, the cathodepotential is switched to ground potential or to a small potential thatis positive with respect to ground (as shown graphically in FIG. 6) andthe operation of the photomultiplier tube is totally inhibited. As soonas the X-ray pulse has passed, the cathode potential can be switchedback to a negative level and the passive radiation monitor will continueto operate. Of course, the +HV value should be decreased by the cathodenormal operating potential in order to achieve the required signal gainin the dynode chain (i.e. +HV should be reduced from 1000V to 835V usingthe figures from the above examples).

By establishing a small positive potential between the cathode and thefirst dynode (for example 10 V), any energetic photoelectrons that areproduced during the X-ray burst will be actively returned to the cathodeduring the burst itself so that the vacuum gap between the cathode andfirst dynode is free of any drifting electrons which could otherwisecontaminate the signals to be recorded immediately after the cathodepotential is returned to its active value.

A suitable circuit for driving the cathode switching potential is shownin FIG. 7. This “push-pull” circuit can achieve switching times from−Von (for example −165V) to +Voff (for example +10V) potential in timesof the order of 100 ns. It is convenient to opto-couple the switchingsignal into the buffer in order to level shift the signal from typicaldigital control circuitry referenced to ground potential to this circuitwhich is referenced to −Von potential.

An example data acquisition system for use with the passive radiationdetector is shown in FIGS. 8 and 13. In this example, the passivedetection system comprises an array of detectors—each passive detectorcomprises a photomultiplier tube 130. Each tube 130 is arranged in aknown spatial position. An active scanning system arranged to scan anobject (in this example a vehicle) comprises a further linear detectorarray 132 for detecting radiation emitted by a radiation source of thescanning system. The radiation from the active radiation sourceirradiates the object and the active system's linear detector 132detects radiation that passes through or is scattered by the object. Theposition of the scanning system detector 132 relative to each detector130 is known. As the vehicle moves past the detectors 130, 132,information from the detectors 130, 132 is sent to a controller 134. Thespeed of the vehicle can also be taken into account when producing thespatially correlated information. The controller correlates spatiallythe information from the two sets of detectors 130, 132. This ispossible for the passive detector since it is in the form of an array ofseparate detectors 130—each detector measures absolute levels ofradiation, in order to detect radiation emitted from anyradiation-emitting material in the object—this detection is controlledby the controller 134 such that it is carried out whilst the activeradiation source is not irradiating the object. In the prior art,passive detectors are not provided in such arrays, instead there is onlya large passive detector (as described with reference to FIG. 1) andspatially correlated information is not provided in the same way. Thespatially correlated information can be used to determine where withinan actively scanned region a passively detected radiation-emittingmaterial is located. Here, each photomultiplier tube (PMT) 130 iscoupled to its own shaper circuit, discriminator and digital databuffer. Therefore the overlaid image shown in FIG. 12 can be obtained insome embodiments (as described in further detail below).

As shown in FIG. 9, the shaper circuit formats the data from the PMTinto a pulse suitable for subsequent discrimination. The first stage inthe shaper is a gain stage with a time constant set that is typicallyseveral milliseconds. The second stage is RC (low pass) filteringfollowed by CR (high pass) filtering to leave a positive going pulsewith duration of typically a few microseconds. The selection offiltering times in the RC-CR shaping stage will define the noiseperformance of the system but is typically set for both parts at a fewmicroseconds. Other settings will be apparent to the skilled person.

The discriminator circuit may have different design depending onspecific application. When using plastic scintillators in which there isno true photopeak (due to the low atomic number of the scintillatormaterial) it is typically sufficient to introduce a single discriminatorwindow using a circuit of the type shown in simplified form in FIG. 10.Here, the output from the shaper stage passes into two analoguecomparator circuits, The first checks the height of the pulse withrespect to a lower level discriminator (LLD) setting and the otherchecks the height of the pulse with respect to an upper leveldiscriminator (ULD) setting. Pulses which are greater in magnitude thanthe LLD but lower than the ULD are accepted and generate a digitaloutput pulse at the output of the logic circuit.

In an alternative embodiment which is better suited for use within-organic scintillators where the magnitude of the optical signalsgenerated better reflects the shape of the input gamma-ray energydistribution, the intensity of the light flash is measured using ananalogue-to-digital converter 110 and the values of successive valuescan be histogrammed to form an energy dependent analysis of the materialunder inspection. Such a circuit is shown in simplified form in FIG. 11.Here the logic circuit is used to determine whether the signal is abovethe noise floor. If it is, an ADC conversion is initiated and theresulting digital value is then histogrammed to a digital memory 112.

At the final stage of data acquisition, the digital data from eachphotomultiplier detection chain is multiplexed down to a single datastream which is advantageously in the Ethernet format. This data ispassed to a computer for final analysis.

In the event that a discriminator of the form shown in FIG. 10 is used,the analysis will normally consist of a dynamic background subtractionfollowed by comparison of the residual signal against threshold. If anabove threshold signal is observed, an alarm will typically be raised.

In the event that a discriminator of the form shown in FIG. 11 is used,the analysis will normally proceed as noted above. However, if an abovethreshold signal is detected, the shape of the energy distribution willtypically be analysed against known spectral lines in order to provide apreliminary assessment of the type of radioactive material that has beendetected, and both the type and activity of the radioactive source willbe passed on to the operator.

In a further aspect of this invention, data 122 from the passiveradiation monitoring system is overlayed with image data 124 from theX-ray imaging system. An example data overlay is shown in FIG. 12. Here,the total count per X-ray pulse is displayed in graphical form in awindow at the base of the screen. To improve noise performance, theoperator is provided with means to change the integration window for thegamma-ray data so that the signal distribution appears “smoother”. Inthe event that gamma-ray spectral data has been collected, the operatoris provided with a pop-up window to view both the energy distributionand fitting data to a suitable gamma-ray library. This graphical viewshould normally utilise the same integration window that is used fordisplay of the primary count data. As the operator moves their cursorabout the image, the graph is advantageously updated in real-time toreflect the gamma-ray spectrum that was collected from the equivalentregion of the object under inspection.

It is advantageous to combine spectral data collection with the use ofdata deconvolution algorithm. Such an algorithm is provided with theenergy response function of the detector itself so that this responsecan be de-convolved from the measured gamma-ray spectral data. Further,the energy response function for a number of known gamma-ray sources isprovided to the de-convolution algorithm such that signals that fallinto the Compton continuum can be restored to their full energy peak.This provides a considerably sharper spectrum which can be used to goodadvantage when fitting to data from a standard gamma-decay library.

In another aspect of the invention, FIG. 14 shows an alternative systemset-up to that shown in FIG. 5. Typically X-rays having a peak energyvalue of 900 keV or higher are used for X-ray scanning in thisinvention.

There are three primary parts to this front-end electronicsconfiguration circuit:

-   1. Power supply unit, PSU. This takes +12V input and converts this    to an adjustable voltage of up to −1 kV for driving the    photomultiplier tube. The PSU also generates a cathode potential    which may be switched to a negative or positive potential with    respect to the −HV output in order to inhibit the photomultiplier    tube, PMT operation during X-ray pulses.-   2. Analogue to digital converter, ADC. This directly digitises the    output of the PMT. This should be a high speed device that is    capable of recording pulse heights during the X-ray pulse as well as    pulses due to passive gamma interactions.-   3. Field-programmable gate array, FPGA. The FPGA is configured as a    digital pulse processor. This provides time and magnitude    information for every above-threshold radiation interaction. The    FPGA drives the event based data stream out to the rest of the data    acquisition system.

The detectors are not temperature stabilised in this embodiment since itis expensive to undertake this and also leads to unreliability ofsystems in practical customer installations. The present system shouldtherefore be capable of calibration by a relatively untrained operator.

One way to do this is to provide a reference radioactive source forevery detector and to use this for spectrum stabilisation. However, thismay be difficult to achieve and leads to transportation issues.

As an alternative, a light source with line of sight to the scintillatorcan be pulsed and this used as a way of confirming the calibration ofthe PMT and electronics system. This is simple to achieve and bysplitting the light source so that it irradiates a photodiode as well asthe scintillator, it is possible to provide a reasonably accuratecalibration of the system.

I claim:
 1. An inspection system for scanning an object for threatmaterials comprising: a plurality of passive detectors configured todetect passive radiation emitted from material in the scanned object; anactive detection system comprising a radiation source to irradiate thescanned object and a plurality of active detectors configured to detectradiation emitted by said radiation source after it passes throughand/or is scattered by the scanned object; and a control systemconfigured to perform the functions of controlling a switching ofpassive detectors between a detecting state and a non-detecting statesuch that the passive detectors are switched to a non-detecting statewhen the active radiation source is irradiating the object; receivingseparate sets of detection data from the plurality of passive and activedetectors; and correlating said separate sets of detection data toestimate a presence of threat materials in the scanned object.
 2. Theinspection system for scanning an object according to claim 1, whereinsaid passive detectors comprise an array of detectors.
 3. The inspectionsystem for scanning an object according to claim 1, wherein saidplurality of passive detectors are configured in a predetermined spatialposition with respect to said plurality of active detectors.
 4. Theinspection system for scanning an object according to claim 3, whereinthe predetermined spatial positioning of said plurality of passive andactive detectors is correlated with the separate sets of detection datafor estimating the presence of threat materials in the scanned object.5. The inspection system for scanning an object according to claim 4,wherein a speed of a moving scanned object is monitored and correlatedwith the separate sets of detection data to estimate the presence ofthreat materials in said object.
 6. The inspection system for scanningan object according to claim 1, wherein said control system furthercontrols a displaying of information received from said plurality ofactive and passive detectors simultaneously on a display monitor forviewing by a system operator.
 7. The inspection system for scanning anobject according to claim 1, wherein the control system switches only asubset of passive detectors in a non-detecting state depending on thespatial positioning of said subset of passive detectors with respect tospatial positioning of said plurality of active detectors.
 8. Theinspection system for scanning an object according to claim 1, whereinthe control system switches only a subset of passive detectors in anon-detecting state depending on the direction of the radiation emittedby said radiation source.
 9. The inspection system for scanning anobject according to claim 1, wherein each of said plurality of passivedetectors comprise a switchable photomultiplier which is adapted to beswitchable between a detecting state and a non-detecting state.
 10. Theinspection system for scanning an object according to claim 9, whereinsaid switchable photomultiplier comprises a cathode arranged to receivean incident radiation; a plurality of electrodes; and a first electrodeof the plurality of electrodes, wherein said first electrode isoperatively closest to the cathode relative to other of said pluralityof electrodes, wherein said first electrode is at a first potential andwherein an electrical potential of the cathode is switchable between asecond potential, below the first potential, when the photomultiplier isin a detecting state and a third potential, above the second potential,when the photomultiplier in a non-detecting state.
 11. The inspectionsystem for scanning an object according to claim 1, wherein each of saidplurality of passive detectors comprises a photomultiplier tube.
 12. Theinspection system for scanning an object according to claim 11, whereineach of said photomultiplier tubes is coupled to a shaper circuit, adiscriminator and a digital data buffer.
 13. The inspection system forscanning an object according to claim 1, wherein said passive detectorscomprise a gamma detector.
 14. The inspection system for scanning anobject according to claim 1, wherein said radiation source comprise anX-ray source.
 15. An inspection system for scanning an object for threatmaterials comprising: a plurality of passive detectors configured todetect the passive radiation emitted from any radiation emittingmaterial in a scanned object; an active detection system comprising aradiation source to irradiate the scanned object and a plurality ofactive detectors configured to detect radiation emitted by saidradiation source after it passes through and/or is scattered by thescanned object; a control system configured to control the switching ofpassive detectors between a detecting state and a non-detecting statesuch that the passive detectors are switched to a non-detecting statewhen the radiation source is irradiating the object.
 16. The inspectionsystem for scanning an object according to claim 15, wherein theinspection system correlates data received from said plurality of activedetectors with data received from said plurality of passive detectors toestimate a presence of threat materials in the scanned object.
 17. Theinspection system for scanning and object according to claim 15, whereina relative spatial positioning of said plurality of active detectors andsaid plurality of passive detectors is correlated with data receivedfrom said detectors to estimate the presence of threat materials in thescanned object.
 18. The inspection system for scanning an objectaccording to claim 16, wherein each of said plurality of passivedetectors comprise a switchable photomultiplier which is adapted to beswitchable between a detecting state and a non-detecting state.